Home

Previous | Next

Online tests and economic pigeonholing

  • Oct. 5th, 2005 at 8:28 PM
Politics
Well, I remembered why I switched from Mozilla to Firefox, and went and did an OK Cupid! test. The browse didn't crash. Shame I can't say the same about Thunderbird; I've found all the mail, and been told how to reboot it so it loads it back up, but it won't give me a profile with access to it. Gah!

Anyway, to topic. I took the
You are a

Social Liberal
(70% permissive)

and an...

Economic Liberal
(30% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Democrat




Link: The Politics Test on Ok Cupid
Also: The OkCupid Dating Persona Test


and found the results to be a little weird to say the least, although they didn't surprise me. Essentially, I'mstrong on social freedoms, but strong on social protection. The problem with these things is it judges a desire to give a safety net and an equal start to everyone as being economically controlling, and makes me non economically permissive.

Wrong! I'm a strong believer in the principles of a market economy, the Market is undoubtedly the most efficient means of distribution and exchange yet discovered, and it's pretty good with assessing the value of an individual product, as long as it is a functioning market.

The thing is, I don't believe in corporate ownership, and would rather shop in small, local businesses than chain stores whenver possible. But every tick in favour of controls on corporations makes me "less" in favour of economic freedoms. This isn't tied to online tests, it's endemic within commentary on economics. It's assumed you're either 'Left' or 'Right' economically, there doesn't seem to be any understanding of the difference between social justice, fair trade and a functioning market analysis.

Sorry, rant over, I return you to your regularly schedule of me bouncing all over the room and worrying about the phone bill.

Comments

( Comment )
[info]paulatpingu wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2005 12:56 pm (UTC)
I wont bother wasting bandwidth with anther picture, suffice to say that if I squint I think I'm a simdgen to the left of you on the social/economic scale.

(68%, 28% for what it matters)

Oh, congratulations on the bouncing by the way. Just don't do yourself an injury before you don't need to use the phone as a substitute, if you know what I mean.
[info]matgb wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2005 01:04 pm (UTC)
What, us getting almost identical results on something that asks our opinions? Never!

I'll be emailing when I've finished getting gmail to work right.
[info]theweaselking wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2005 12:57 pm (UTC)
Pssst! That OK Cupid test, like most of it's sort, are written by Internet Libertarians with the express purpose of showing either that everyone is a Internet Libertarian or that Internet Libertarianism is the sole reasonable decision, ever.

Internet Libertarians can be distinguished from the normal kind by the fact that they're clueless assholes who actively deny facts that don't fit their worldview, instead of normal Libertarians, who are just ignorant of the facts and don't consider the consequences of their policies.
[info]matgb wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2005 01:08 pm (UTC)
I don't know, it's a very similar result to my political compass result, which was again very similar to a thing I did with MORI a few years back. It's a crap test, but it put my result where I expected to see it. It's just wrong, but that's not the fault of the test, even economists don't understand what I'm talking about when I make the distinction half the time :-(
[info]paulatpingu wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2005 01:47 pm (UTC)
Er yeah, it's an internet test. If you pay anything more than passing attention to it, you're stupider than you look. I think with politics test I kinda know where I stand, what with having degrees in it an' all.

And it does rightly suggest that me and Mat are pretty much identical, which well, we are.
[info]nadriel wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2005 01:53 pm (UTC)
Care to explain the bouncing all over the room?
[info]nadriel wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2005 02:04 pm (UTC)
Oh, and will you be at the Cavern tomorrow?
[info]matgb wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2005 02:25 pm (UTC)
If I'm at work, yes, if not, no.

Absolutely plan to be, and want to hear David's band, but I won't go out if I'm off sick, it's wrong.
( Comment )

Introspection

I'm Mat Bowles, a Devonshire lad displaced to Yorkshire. I'm a part-time analyst, marketer and website manage, although mostly I'm a house-husband.

Wikio - Top BlogsThis is my personal general interest journal where I write about or link to whatever I've fond that amused, intrigued or enraged me at the time. I'm a committed liberal, equalist and atheist, but I really like it when people can demonstrate I'm wrong, and have close friends with whom I completely disagree on some if not all of those points.

Coalition For Choice

There probably ought to be a Creative Commons licence in here somewhere but in the meantime consider this permission to quote me (link) & link to what I write.

If you decide to keep reading, please do say hello, let me know where you found me from, etc. I promise not to bite (well, unless you want me to...)

Latest Month

November 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by [info]matgb

Nasty Commercial Stuff

Advertisement